A small idea borrowed from astronomy — and what it explains about why some achievements travel and others don’t.
Start with the name, because someone clearly sat down and built it on purpose. Glonary is global welded to luminary — and a luminary, before it ever meant an admired person, meant a thing that gives off light. Put those two halves back together and you get a fairly precise instruction: light, measured at a global distance.
That turns out to be a much better idea than it first sounds, and here is why.
The candle problem
The brightest object in your room right now is not the sun. It’s a lamp, or a screen, or a candle if you’re having that kind of evening. The sun is roughly a trillion times more luminous and loses anyway, because the lamp is three feet away and the sun is ninety-three million miles off.
Proximity fakes brightness. This is such a persistent nuisance that astronomers eventually had to fix it, and the fix is elegant. They separated two ideas: apparent magnitude — how bright something looks from where you happen to be standing — and absolute magnitude — how bright it actually is. To get the second one, you do something imaginary and very fair: you move every object to the same standard distance, and only then compare.
Sirius is the brightest star in our night sky. Move it and its neighbours to that common distance and it slides quietly down the rankings, because a good part of its glamour was simply being nearby. Meanwhile stars nobody has heard of turn out to be furnaces.
Most recognition measures the wrong thing
You can see where this is going, because business runs on apparent magnitude almost all of the time.
Whoever stands nearest the microphone looks like the expert. Whoever bought the bigger booth looks like the bigger company. Whoever posts more looks busier than whoever is actually building the thing. None of that is fraud — it’s just distance doing what distance does. A modest result announced loudly from two feet away will outshine an extraordinary one delivered quietly from another continent, every single time.
Which is why the interesting question about any award is not how glamorous the ceremony is. It’s whether the thing is measuring apparent or absolute magnitude.
Measuring apparent magnitude is easy and, if we’re honest, fun. Let the audience vote. Count the followers. Reward whoever mobilised the most friends by Friday. You get engagement, you get a viral moment, and you get a result that tells you precisely nothing you didn’t already know — because the people with the largest audience were, definitionally, already visible.
Measuring absolute magnitude is more work. You have to ask for evidence instead of adjectives: what changed, by how much, according to what. You have to hand the reading to people who know the field well enough to tell a real result from a well-lit one — and then keep the audience out of the scoring entirely, along with anyone who paid for a logo on the banner. And you have to put everyone at the same distance, which is the whole trick: a founder in Lagos and a security lead in Helsinki assessed by the same standard, with neither one credited for being closer to the room where the decision happens.
And then, occasionally, you have to be willing to look at a category and say: nobody this year. Nothing here clears the bar. That single sentence does more for an award’s credibility than any red carpet, because it proves the bar was load-bearing.
The other thing about light
There’s a second idea hiding in the metaphor, and it’s the one I find quietly reassuring.
Starlight is always old news. What you see tonight left its source years or centuries ago; by the time it arrives, the event is long finished. Recognition behaves identically. Nobody has ever been given an award for what they are about to do. It shows up afterwards — sometimes long afterwards — for work that was completed while nobody was watching, usually on a Tuesday, usually without ceremony.
Which means an award never creates the light. It can’t. The light was already travelling. What a good one does is shorten the distance it has to cross — introduce the work to people it would otherwise have taken years to reach, or who would never have known to look. That’s a smaller claim than most awards make for themselves, and a truer one.
So: how far does your work carry?
This is the part worth taking away, whether or not you ever enter anything.
The usual anxious question is am I being noticed? It’s a question about apparent magnitude, and it has a depressing answer, which is that you can always be noticed more by getting closer and being louder. The better question is the astronomer’s: how far does this carry? Would the work still register from a long way off — in a different country, a different industry, read by someone with no particular reason to be kind to you? Strip out the proximity, the relationships, the reach you’ve built. What’s left?
That’s a harder question and a much more useful one, because it’s the only version you can actually do something about. You can’t make yourself closer to everyone. You can make the work brighter.
For what it’s worth, the platform that named itself after this idea started small — a group of people in 2024 who were simply curious about what was being built, writing up new products and advances in annual guides handed out at expos. Reporting on good work has a way of turning into wanting to celebrate it, and by 2025 the thing had become an international recognition programme with separate tracks for cybersecurity, women in business, influence and information business, technology and design, business leadership, and young innovators.
Six different rooms, one instruction, still legible in the name they picked. Not: be the brightest thing nearby. Be the thing that’s still visible from very far away.
The Glonary® Awards is an international professional recognition programme honouring achievements in business, technology, innovation, design, cybersecurity, and related fields worldwide. More at glonaryawards.com.
Add Comment